[Lars H]? For a more robust (but also heavier) Tcl parser in Tcl, see [parsetcl]. [GPS]: Yours is much more complex than mine. I won't comment on the issue of robustness. I made some changes and now version 5 passes the test you proposed at the end of this page. I also added an optional parray test, which it also passes now. ====== ---- #Copyright 2003 George Peter Staplin #You may use this under the same terms as Tcl. #A Mini Tcl Parser in Tcl. #version 5 interp alias {} loop {} while 1 set s { A [B 123] [C 456 [C2 789]] set x [+ 20 [* 30 200]] list a b {a b} $c {$c} [d e; f g] } if 0 { #We need to have autoloading source the parray code. array set ar {} parray ar append s "\n[info body parray]" } #1 or 0 proc get.token {s iPtr tokPtr typePtr} { upvar $iPtr i upvar $tokPtr tok upvar $typePtr type set tok "" set sLen [string length $s] set lastChar "" #unknown, brace, bracket, quote, end set type unknown set braceCount 0 set bracketCount 0 set quote 0 for {} {$i < $sLen} {incr i} { set c [string index $s $i] if {$braceCount} { if {("\{" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { incr braceCount } elseif {("\}" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { incr braceCount -1 } if {0 == $braceCount} { incr i return 1 } append tok $c } elseif {$bracketCount} { if {("\[" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { incr bracketCount } elseif {("\]" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { incr bracketCount -1 } if {0 == $bracketCount} { incr i return 1 } append tok $c } elseif {$quote} { if {("\"" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { incr i return 1 } append tok $c } else { if {("\{" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { set type brace incr braceCount } elseif {("\[" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { set type bracket incr bracketCount } elseif {("\"" == $c) && ("\\" != $lastChar)} { set type quote set quote 1 } elseif {(" " == $c) || ("\t" == $c)} { if {[string length $tok]} { return 1 } } elseif {("\n" == $c) || ("\r" == $c) || (";" == $c)} { if {[string length $tok]} { return 1 } else { set type end set tok $c incr i return 1 } } else { append tok $c } } set lastChar $c } if {"unknown" ne $type} { puts stderr "incomplete command: still in state of $type" return 0 } if {[string length $tok]} { return 1 } return 0 } set ::level 0 proc parse s { global level set i 0 set tok "" set type "" loop { set r [get.token $s i tok type] if {!$r} break #puts "TOK:$tok TYPE:$type" if {"end" == $type} { puts [string repeat " " $level]SEP } elseif {"bracket" == $type} { incr level puts [string repeat " " $level]BRACK parse $tok incr level -1 } else { puts [string repeat " " $level]TOK:$tok } } } proc main {} { parse $::s } main ====== ---- Example output: $ tclsh85g.exe mini_tcl_parser-3.tcl TOK:A TOK:B TOK:123 TOK:C TOK:456 TOK:C2 TOK:789 TOK:set TOK:x TOK:+ TOK:20 TOK:* TOK:30 TOK:200 ---- [Lars H] (19 aug 2003): It seems a bit simplistic. Consider: % parse {list a b {a b} $c {$c} [d e; f g]} TOK:list TOK:a TOK:b TOK:a b TOK:$c TOK:$c TOK:d TOK:e TOK:f TOK:g That $c and {$c} are the same can be an artifact of the way that the parse procedure presents the result (type information not shown), but the level of the f and g tokens is simply wrong. ---- [GPS]: I've fixed this problem. Thanks for pointing it out. Here's the output with version 5: $ tclsh85g.exe mini_tcl_parser-5.tcl SEP TOK:A BRACK TOK:B TOK:123 BRACK TOK:C TOK:456 BRACK TOK:C2 TOK:789 SEP TOK:set TOK:x BRACK TOK:+ TOK:20 BRACK TOK:* TOK:30 TOK:200 SEP TOK:list TOK:a TOK:b TOK:a b TOK:$c TOK:$c BRACK TOK:d TOK:e SEP TOK:f TOK:g SEP ---- Information for people who are interesting in parsing Tcl in Tcl. [XOTclIDE] have own Tcl Parser (Component IDETclParser) that is implemented object oriented in XOTcl. It is used to make syntax hightligting and syntax checker. The Parse Tree is build as nested XOTcl Objects that can be directly used to make operations on it. The XOTcIDE Parser also parse scripts from known Tcl commands. For example command (foreach variable list script). The parser knows that the last element of command is script and parse it as script. In this case the parser tries to emulate Tcl interpreter. It knows how some commands work. For example it knows that (set a 32) will define new variable a. Of course it will not work for special Tcl scripts as set a {puts script} if {$condition} $a But normal case is if {$condition} {puts script} For such scripts the syntax checker can proof "puts" to be valid command. The nature of Tcl make it very easy to build parser. But only for "first evalutation level". At this level there are only commands and words. (Also internal Tcl Parser knows special commands as if and for and parse command arguments (words) as scripts) <> Parsing