"Create, Retrieve, Update, and Delete"
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRUD_%28acronym%29]


[[Tcl does fine, but doesn't really compete.
Explain much more context.]]

[RLH] I think in a bigger sense you see the "other" [web] [framework]s that create CRUD applications pretty much on-the-fly. Scaffolding and such seems the rage now days.

[LV] What's an example of such a framework? Are we talking about things like Excel?
Remember to compare "apples" to "apples" - Tcl isn't a web framework. Tcl+some extensions would equate to a web framework.

[RLH] Yes we are talking web frameworks. Or at least I was. [Python], [Perl], [PHP] and [Ruby] all have this.

[LV] I don't know those communities - do you have any specific examples for one (or more) of these in mind?

[RLH] These are some of the things to look at if you want to see what is out there:

   * (Ruby)  Rails:  http://www.rubyonrails.org/
   * (Perl) Catalyst: http://www.catalystframework.org/ or Jifty: http://jifty.org/view/HomePage  or CGI::Application: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/
   * (Python) TurboGears: http://www.turbogears.org/ or Django: http://www.djangoproject.com/
   * (Java) Groovy: http://groovy.codehaus.org/ and Grails: http://grails.codehaus.org/
 
A lot of them integrate some kind of [Ajax] stuff as well as creating scaffolding for getting the most common things done quickly. Some are not so flexible (Rails) while other (like TurboGears and Catalyst) are super flexible but they all make doing web application programming "easier" to some extent.

Anyone have a suggested set of Tcl [extension]s that would make Tcl into something equivalent? Perhaps [ActiveTcl]'s set of extensions?

[RS]: Looking at Wikipedia about CRUD, it looks like [sqlite] fills the description best. Or even a simpler mechanism, where the crud is written to a text file in Tcl format, and loaded with [source]...

[schlenk] For a basic set of extensions for something like this, you need a) a [database] abstraction layer, see [Comparing Tcl database abstraction layers] for a large list, b) an OO extension, probably [XOTcl] and a templating framework, for example the one built into [tclhttpd], expand, or [rivet]'s templates.
[LV] What about [http://wiki.tcl.tk/17422]? Does that fit the bill as part
of this? What other things might go into the mix?

[RLH] Actually I would go with [Snit] because it is pure Tcl. However, the big thing is to put it all together as seamlessly as possible and as neat as possible so people outside of Tcl will say that is cool and want to learn it (which is what happened with Rails and Ruby). 

[LV] I presume you are suggesting replacing XOTcl with Snit?

Perhaps there aren't very many people doing much complicated sites with Tcl on the web?

patrick@zill.net responds:  There are """plenty""" of people doing complicated sites with Tcl!  For CRUD, this has been around a while in TCL, but the people who implement it call it "dynamic types" and never thought to invent a whole marketing platform around it!  See [http://med.openacs.org/xowiki/en/Case_Studies] and watch the video tour, I think about halfway through you can see the dynamic types stuff.

[LV] Thanks for the pointer. It seems, to me, that what makes some of the other language based frameworks more palatible to new web developers is that
someone has collected the necessary pieces and put together enough
documentation to allow them to download, install, and start coding HTML,
without having to do a lot of ''lower level'' design. This seems to be
the case in a variety of areas where other language solutions are being
used - Tcl can certainly be used to solve various kinds of problems.
So could ksh in many cases. And I've seen awk used in some pretty amazing
places.  Until someone at least writes some tutorials/guides on what
pieces to use, and how to use them to create examples with some '''wow'''
factor, then people are going to turn to those who have done that legwork
to examine their solutions, whether commercial or free.

<<categories>> Acronym | Database