Maintenance and development of [Tcl]'s core is itself a substantial project, one which certainly benefits from disciplined use of [SCM] tools. As of July 2003, [SourceForge] has hosted this work (for several years?). There's sentiment to relocate Tcl's home to another technology ''and'' another site, because [[enumerate reasons]]. As [CL] understands matters, [BitKeeper] and [CVSTrac] are under consideration. ---- [PT] 16-Jul-2003: Bugzilla provides an extremely good bug tracking system that is highly configurable and significantly better than the SourceForge trackers with low software overheads (Apache, MySQL and Perl :( ). I don't see much need to move away from a CVS based version control system. Bitkeeper is more efficient but imposes a barier to new contributors (ie: it costs). The Tcl code base really isn't large enough to demand the increased efficiency over CVS. Any new site should continue to provide pserver and ssh based cvs access and should probably continue to provide cvsweb or equivalent web browsing of the cvs tree. ----