[GWM] Runge-Kutta methods of solving ODE [Ordinary Differential Equations] are numerical techniques to find the solution to an ODE. R-K methods are more stable and accurate than [Euler Methods]. The Tcllib math::calculus has a R-K implementation; this page is about a simple code to show how RK works. A slightly more accurate solver is the [Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg] solver which has automatic integration step reduction and error estimation. A number of steps are used to advance a parameter through time (or space, depending on the equation). For example: d/dt(N)=-k.N (rate of change of number proportional to the population). Euler method would try: loop (until fed up) { N=N-k.N*dt time=time+dt } Which deviates from the true solution very quickly since the population is changing during the time step; very short time steps will reduce the error but take a long time. R-K methods use a numerical integration procedure which takes several (often 4) intermediate calculations to find an approximate integral of the equation. See reference 1 below for more details. The following code will solve d(N)/dt=-2*n with good accuracy. # tcl runge-kutta solution of ODES # single variable - use rk4step (included for simplicity) proc decay { time xn } { ;# simple decay proportional to amount (gives radioactive half life, eg) return [expr -2.0*$xn] } proc rk4step {x time dt dxdtproc } { ;# proc is such that dx/dt = dxdtproc(t) set k1 [$dxdtproc $time $x] ;# k1 = f (tn, xn) set k2 [$dxdtproc [expr $time+($dt*0.5)] [expr $x + $dt*0.5*$k1]] ;# k2 = f (tn + h?2, xn + h?2 k1) set k3 [$dxdtproc [expr $time +$dt*0.5] [expr $x + $dt*0.5*$k2] ] ;# k3= f (tn + h?2, xn + h?2 k2) set k4 [$dxdtproc [expr $time +$dt] [expr $x + $dt*$k3] ] ;# k4= f (tn + h, xn + h k3) return [expr $x + $dt/6.0 *($k1 + 2*$k2 + 2*$k3 + $k4)] ;# h/6(simpsons rule) } proc test {} { set y 0 set mass 1 set dt 0.1 ;# try shortening dt to see numerical inaccuracy # use single equation R_K scheme - log decay of radioactivity eg (dN/dt=-n-->> N(t)=exp(-t) for {set time 0} {[expr $time<=2] } { set time [expr $time+$dt]} { puts "At time $time $mass" set mass [rk4step $mass $time $dt decay] ;# dmass/dt = -mass - mass=m0(1-exp(time/k)) } } test at time =0.5 decay should be exp(-1)=0.367879441171 the solver gives 0.367885238126 at time =1.0 decay should be exp(-2)=0.135335283237 the solver gives 0.135339548431 ---- If you have more complex ODEs such as the damped harmonic oscillator (of order 2, ie uses d2N/dt2): y" -k.y' + om.y=0 you should break this into 2 equations using v=y': v' = k.v - om.y y' = v and solve as suggested in reference 1 below. I have added a simple plotting algorithm (copied and simplified from [A little graph plotter]) to show the solution of this equation for a range of damping coefficients 'k'. # tcl runge-kutta solution of ODES # N variables - use rk4step_array. Can be used for higher order ODEs # A simple plotting algorithm on a canvas is added. set k -0.25 set omega [expr 2*3.14159] # plotted example - damped oscillator; dv/dt = -k.v -omega.y & dx/dt=v proc dxdt { time dt xn} { ;# xn is array of current variables; dx/dt is first element = speed upvar 1 $xn x ;# array of values return $x(0) } proc oscdvdt { time dt xn} { ; upvar 1 $xn x ;# array of values global k omega ;# allows editing, eg to see negatively damped oscilation type "set k 0.2; plot" return [expr $k*$x(0)-$x(1)*$omega ] ;# if omega = 2Pi takes 1 sec to oscillate once (Slightly longer if highly damped!) } proc rk4step_array {vars time dt dxdts } { ;# proc is such that dx/dt = dxdtproc(t,x) # for each member of the array 'vars' there is function dxdtproc(i) # such that d/dt(vars(i) = dxdtproc(i) # dxdtproc(i) has args time, step, array of values upvar 1 $vars x ;# upvar 1 means: use the variable in the calling routine - called $vars with local name x upvar 1 $dxdts dxdtproc ;# list of functions for the rhs of equations set neqs [array size dxdtproc] ;# number of equations being solved for {set i 0} {$i<$neqs} { incr i} { set k1($i) [ $dxdtproc($i) $time $dt x] ;# k1 = f (tn, xn, yn) set xnu($i) [expr $x($i) + 0.5*$dt*$k1($i) ] ;# next values to evaluate df/dx } for {set i 0} {$i<$neqs} { incr i} { set k2($i) [$dxdtproc($i) $time $dt xnu] set xnu2($i) [expr $x($i) + 0.5*$dt*$k2($i) ] ;# next values } for {set i 0} {$i<$neqs} { incr i} { set k3($i) [$dxdtproc($i) $time $dt xnu2] set xnu3($i) [expr $x($i) + $dt*$k3($i) ] ;# next values } for {set i 0} {$i<$neqs} { incr i} { set k4($i) [$dxdtproc($i) $time $dt xnu3] } for {set i 0} {$i<$neqs} { incr i} { set dv [expr $k1($i) + 2*($k2($i) + $k3($i)) + $k4($i) ] set x($i) [expr $x($i) + $dt*0.1666667 * $dv] } } proc plot {} { ;# uses the simple graph plotter found on http://wiki.tcl.tk/8552 # -------------------------- # params # -------------------------- # title # canvas width & height # delay between plots # x = f(t) # initial & final times array set params \ { title {Damped Oscillator} width 400 height 400 delay 0 x {$t / 50.} t0 0 t1 400 } # -------------------------- # plotting # -------------------------- # computed heights used to scale vertical units set h $params(height) set h1 [expr {int($h * 0.5)}] ;# canvas mid-height set h2 [expr {$h1 + 1}] set h3 [expr {int($h * 0.4)}] ;# graph mid-height # canvas if [winfo exists .c] { ;# delete it. Same as clear. destroy .c } canvas .c -width $params(width) -height $h \ -xscrollincrement 1 -bg beige pack .c # plotting wm title . $params(title) set t $params(t0) # GWM start up the oscillator solver array set fns [list 0 oscdvdt 1 dxdt] ;# dv/dt and dx/dt equations to be solved in 'parallel'. array set vars [list 0 0 1 0.5] ;# initial values of time and X set tspace [expr $params(t1)/8.0] ;# how often to draw grid set nexttic $tspace .c create text 20 10 -anchor n -text "Velocity" -fill red .c create text 20 25 -anchor n -text "Position" -fill black while {$t != $params(t1)} \ { update set time [expr $t/30.0] rk4step_array vars $time 0.02 fns ;# integrate the second order ODE set x [expr $params(x)] set vv $vars(1) set v [expr {int($vv * $h3) + $h1}] if {$t >= $nexttic} { set nexttic [expr $nexttic+$tspace] .c create text $t 0 -anchor n -text $t -fill gray .c create line $t 0 $t $h -fill gray } .c create line $t $h1 $t $h2 -fill gray .c create rectangle $t $v $t $v set vv $vars(0) set v [expr {int($vv * $h3) + $h1}] .c create rectangle $t $v $t $v -outline red incr t } } for {set k 0 } {$k>-1.0} {set k [expr $k-0.1]} { after 120 ;# wait for a moment.... plot } If you have copied and pasted this code into Wish, when the automatic runs are ended use commands such as "set k -0.44;plot" to draw with damping term 0.44; "set k 0.2;plot" to show a growing sinusoid; "set omega 12;plot" to use a higher oscillation frequency. The method (and the code) works for N variables - you could have 2 linked equations such as y" -k.y' + om.y + a.x=0 x" -k.x' + om2.x + b.y=0 yielding u' = k.u - om2.x +b.y x' = u v' = k.v - om.y + a.x y' = v Creating functions to evaluate u', v' and extending the array of variables to store x and u will solve the linked equations numerically. ---- This reference is simple & easy to follow: [http://www.myphysicslab.com/runge_kutta.html] (and useful). The pdf reference is very comprehensive [http://www.nrbook.com/a/bookcpdf/c16-2.pdf] including adaptive stepsize control and higher order methods for error limitation. Recommended exercise: see the [Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg] page for a better solver. Cash-Karp automatic accuracy methods could also be implemented (see [http://www.library.cornell.edu/nr/bookcpdf/c16-2.pdf]. [Category Mathematics]