In [Tcl Gems] [Michael Schlenker] saw a proc by Ed Suominen to do list comparision (set comparision would be more precise). This is related to [Manipulating sets in tcl]. As [setok] said it seemed suboptimal, so i did some tests with alternatives: So here are the rivals: Ed's original (it does return incorrect results...): ====== proc listcomp1 { list1 list2 out1Name out2Name } { ### Define empty lists in case one has no unique elements set out1 {}; set out2 {} ### Test each element of each list against all elements of other list foreach {i} $list1 {j} $list2 { # First, test for unique element in list1 if { [ lsearch -exact $list2 $i ] < 0 } { lappend out1 $i } # Then test for unique element in list2 if { [ lsearch -exact $list1 $j ] < 0 } { lappend out2 $j } } ### Put results in specified lists upvar $out1Name x set x $out1 upvar $out2Name x set x $out2 ### END LISTCOMP return } ====== My first try with presorted lists (this returns junk too, like eds): ====== proc listcomp2 { list1 list2 out1Name out2Name } { set out1 {}; set out2 {} set list1 [lsort -increasing [K $list1 [set list1 ""]]] set list2 [lsort -increasing [K $list2 [set list2 ""]]] foreach {i} $list1 {j} $list2 { if { [ lsearch -sorted -exact $list2 $i ] < 0 } { lappend out1 $i } if { [ lsearch -sorted -exact $list1 $j ] < 0 } { lappend out2 $j } } upvar #0 $out1Name x set x $out1 upvar #0 $out2Name x set x $out2 return } ====== My second try with an array (this works correct): ====== proc listcomp3 { list1 list2 out1Name out2Name } { set x [list] set y [list] # cache boolean representation in 0val and 1val set 0val [expr {0!=0}] set 1val [expr {1==1}] foreach item $list1 { set A($item) $0val } foreach item $list2 { if {[info exists A($item)]} { unset A($item) } else { set A($item) $1val } } foreach key [array names A] { if {$A($key)} { lappend x $key } else { lappend y $key } } upvar $out1Name B set B $x upvar $out2Name C set C $y return } ====== My third try with a while loop (this works correct too): ====== proc listcomp4 {list1 list2 outVar1 outVar2} { set A [list] set B [list] set i 0 set j 0 set list1 [lsort $list1] set list2 [lsort $list2] set l1 [llength $list1] set l2 [llength $list2] while {($i < $l1) && ($j < $l2)} { if {[set w [string compare [lindex $list1 $i] [lindex $list2 $j]]] == 0} { # equal incr i incr j } else { if {$w < 0} { # list1 < list2 lappend A [lindex $list1 $i] incr i } else { lappend B [lindex $list2 $j] incr j } } } if {$i < $l1} { #not finished with list1 yet #add the remaining parts to A as unique set A [concat $A [lrange $list1 $i end]] # B is complete } else { if {$j < $l2} { #not finished list2 yet set B [concat $B [lrange $list2 $j end]] } } upvar $outVar1 x set x $A upvar $outVar2 y set y $B return } ====== Now the simple benchmark suite: ====== proc K {x y} {set x} proc buildlist {n m} { set result [list] for {set i 0} {$i < $n} {incr i} { if {$i % $m} { lappend result $i } } return $result } proc buildlistR {n m} { set result [list] incr n -1 for {set i $n} {$i > 0} {incr i -1} { if {$i % $m} { lappend result $i } } return $result } proc shuffle6 { list } { set n [llength $list] for { set i 1 } { $i < $n } { incr i } { set j [expr { int( rand() * $n ) }] set temp [lindex $list $i] lset list $i [lindex $list $j] lset list $j $temp } return $list } proc runTest {proc l1 l2 iter} { set A [list] set B [list] set t [time {$proc $l1 $l2 A B} $iter] return $t } proc timetest {size modulo1 modulo2 iter} { puts "Modulus set to $modulo1 / $modulo2, size set to $size, $iter iterations" set l1 [buildlist $size $modulo1] set l2 [buildlist $size $modulo2] puts "Running with increasing sorted lists [llength $l1], [llength $l2] items" puts "----------------------------------------------------" foreach p [list listcomp1 listcomp2 listcomp3 listcomp4] { puts "$p\t: [runTest $p $l1 $l2 $iter]" } puts "----------------------------------------------------\n" set l1 [buildlistR $size $modulo1] set l2 [buildlistR $size $modulo2] puts "Running with decreasing sorted lists [llength $l1], [llength $l2] items" puts "----------------------------------------------------" foreach p [list listcomp1 listcomp2 listcomp3 listcomp4] { puts "$p\t: [runTest $p $l1 $l2 $iter]" } puts "----------------------------------------------------\n" set l1 [shuffle6 $l1] set l2 [shuffle6 $l2] puts "Running with shuffled lists [llength $l1], [llength $l2] items" puts "----------------------------------------------------" foreach p [list listcomp1 listcomp2 listcomp3 listcomp4] { puts "$p\t: [runTest $p $l1 $l2 $iter]" } puts "----------------------------------------------------\n" } ====== ---- Timings done on my PII 350, W2k, ActiveTcl 8.4.2.0. % timetest 1000 2 3 100 Modulus set to 2 / 3, size set to 1000, 100 iterations Running with increasing sorted lists 500, 666 items ---------------------------------------------------- listcomp1 : 179145 microseconds per iteration listcomp2 : 186705 microseconds per iteration listcomp3 : 23429 microseconds per iteration listcomp4 : 12538 microseconds per iteration ---------------------------------------------------- Running with decreasing sorted lists 500, 666 items ---------------------------------------------------- listcomp1 : 178605 microseconds per iteration listcomp2 : 185959 microseconds per iteration listcomp3 : 23441 microseconds per iteration listcomp4 : 12320 microseconds per iteration ---------------------------------------------------- Running with shuffled lists 500, 666 items ---------------------------------------------------- listcomp1 : 184550 microseconds per iteration listcomp2 : 187540 microseconds per iteration listcomp3 : 23535 microseconds per iteration listcomp4 : 13679 microseconds per iteration ---------------------------------------------------- <> Performance