Hypnotoad Writes:
When dealing with Tcl packaging, our conventional terms for things get fuzzy.
Here are the cases that Hypnotoad has encountered in his travels, and needs the community to come to a consensus about what to call them:
1. A binary executable that can take on a VFS payload but has not yet 2. A Binary package that requires a pure-tcl package to be co-installed 3. A Pure-Tcl package that exists solely to service a binary package 4. A collection of pure-tcl packages that can be broken apart